This site is intended for U.S. healthcare professionals.
Menu
Close
Close
Study design1,2
Baseline patient characteristics2
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur badipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur badipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur badipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur badipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur badipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur badipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Optional footnote area for disclaimers etc.
Efficacy was based on response rate and duration of response among patients who had ≥4 lines of prior therapy (97 in Cohort A and 63 in Cohort B).1
Efficacy was based on response rate and durability of response among patients who had ≥4 lines of prior therapy (97 in Cohort A and 63 in Cohort B).1
Post hoc extended follow-up of Cohort A looked at outcomes for (1) all 123 patients enrolled in Cohort A, as well as (2) the subset of 97 patients who had ≥4 prior lines of therapy (efficacy population).2,3
Efficacy Population: BCMA-naïve (n=97) |
|
---|---|
Age, median | 69 |
Age, n (%) | |
<75 | 79 (81.4) |
≥75 | 18 (18.6) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 58 (59.8) |
Female | 39 (40.2) |
Race, n (%) | |
White | 58 (59.8) |
Black | 5 (5.2) |
Asian | 13 (13.4) |
Unknown/Not reported | 21 (21.7) |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |
Hispanic/Latino | 7 (7.2) |
Enrolled Population: BCMA-naïve (N=123) | |
Age, median | 68 |
Age, n (%) | |
<75 | 99 (80.5) |
≥75 | 24 (19.5) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 68 (55.3) |
Female | 55 (44.7) |
Race, n (%) | |
White | 72 (58.5) |
Black | 9 (7.3) |
Asian | 16 (13.0) |
Unknown/Not reported | 26 (21.1) |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |
Hispanic/Latino | 11 (8.9) |
Cohort B: BCMA-exposed (n=63) | |
Age, median | 67 |
Age, n (%) | |
<75 | 51 (81.0) |
≥75 | 12 (19.0) |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 30 (47.6) |
Female | 33 (52.4) |
Race, n (%) | |
White | 11 (8.9) |
Black | 11 (8.9) |
Asian | 11 (8.9) |
Unknown/Not reported | 11 (8.9) |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |
Hispanic/Latino | 7 (11.1) |
Efficacy Population: BCMA-naïve (n=97) |
Enrolled Population: BCMA-naïve (N=123) | Cohort B:
BCMA-exposed (n=63) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Age, median | 69 | 68 | 67 |
Age, n (%) | |||
<75 | 79 (81.4) | 99 (80.5) | 51 (81.0) |
≥75 | 18 (18.6) | 24 (19.5) | 12 (19.0) |
Gender, n (%) | |||
Male | 58 (59.8) | 68 (55.3) | 30 (47.6) |
Female | 39 (40.2) | 55 (44.7) | 33 (52.4) |
Race, n (%) | |||
White | 58 (59.8) | 72 (58.5) | 43 (68.3) |
Black | 5 (5.2) | 9 (7.3) | 2 (3.2) |
Asian | 13 (13.4) | 16 (13.0) | 1 (1.6) |
Unknown/Not reported | 21 (21.7) | 26 (21.1) | 17 (27.0) |
Ethnicity, n (%) | |||
Hispanic/Latino | 7 (7.2) | 11 (8.9) | 7 (11.1) |
Efficacy Population: BCMA-naïve (n=97) |
Enrolled Population: BCMA-naïve (N=123) | Cohort B:
BCMA-exposed (n=63) |
|
---|---|---|---|
ECOG PS, n (%) | |||
0-1 | 92 (94.8) | 116 (94.3) | 59 (93.7) |
2 | 5 (5.2) | 7 (5.7) | 4 (6.3) |
Bone marrow plasma cells ≥50%, n (%) | 20 (20.6) | 26 (21.1) | 11 (17.5) |
Extramedullary disease,* n (%) | 33 (34.0) | 39 (31.7) | 37 (58.7) |
High cytogenetic risk,† n (%) | 22 (22.7) | 31 (25.2) | 13 (20.6) |
R-ISS stage,n (%) | |||
I | 11 (17.5) | 28 (22.8) | 20 (20.6) |
II | 52 (53.6) | 68 (55.3) | 35 (55.6) |
III | 17 (17.5) | 19 (15.4) | |
Renal function, n (%) | |||
CrCl ≤60 mL/min | 34 (35.1) | 42 (34.1) | 23 (36.5) |
Efficacy Population: BCMA-naïve (n=97) |
|
---|---|
ECOG PS,n (%) | |
0-1 | 92 (94.8) |
2 | 5 (5.2) |
Bone marrow plasma cells ≥50%, n (%) | 20 (20.6) |
Extramedullary disease,* n (%) | 33 (34.0) |
High cytogenetic risk,† n (%) | 22 (22.7) |
R-ISS stage, n (%) | |
I | 20 (20.6) |
II | 52 (53.6) |
III | 17 (17.5) |
Renal function, n (%) | |
CrCl ≤60 mL/min | 34 (35.1) |
Enrolled Population: BCMA-naïve (N=123) | |
ECOG PS, n (%) | |
0-1 | 116 (94.3) |
2 | 7 (5.7) |
Bone marrow plasma cells ≥50%, n (%) | 26 (21.1) |
Extramedullary disease,* n (%) | 39 (31.7) |
High cytogenetic risk,† n (%) | 31 (25.2) |
R-ISS stage, n (%) | |
I | 28 (22.8) |
II | 68 (55.3) |
III | 19 (15.4) |
Renal function, n (%) | |
CrCl ≤60 mL/min | 42 (34.1) |
Cohort B: BCMA-exposed (n=63) | |
ECOG PS, n (%) | |
0-1 | 59 (93.7) |
2 | 4 (6.3) |
Bone marrow plasma cells ≥50%, n (%) | 11 (17.5) |
Extramedullary disease,* n (%) | 37 (58.7) |
High cytogenetic risk,† n (%) | 13 (20.6) |
R-ISS stage, n (%) | |
I | 11 (17.5) |
II | 35 (55.6) |
III | 15 (23.8) |
Renal function, n (%) | |
CrCl ≤60 mL/min | 23 (36.5) |
Efficacy Population: BCMA-naïve (n=97) |
Enrolled Population: BCMA-naïve (N=123) | Cohort B:
BCMA-exposed (n=63) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Time since initial diagnosis (months), median | 79.6 | 72.9 | 103.0 |
Prior lines of therapy, median (range) | 5.0 (4-22) | 5.0 (2-22) | 8 (4-19) |
Prior stem-cell transplantation, n (%) | 70 (72.2) | 87 (70.7) | 52 (82.5) |
Triple-class | |||
Exposed,* n (%) | 97 (100.0) | 123 (100.0) | 63 (100.0) |
Refractory,† n (%) | 94 (96.9) | 119 (96.7) | 61 (96.8) |
Penta-drug | |||
Exposed,‡ n (%) | 74 (77.3) | 87 (70.7) | 54 (85.7) |
Refractory,§ n (%) | 45 (46.4) | 52 (42.3) | 33 (52.4) |
Prior pomalidomide therapy, n (%) | 82 (84.5) | 100 (81.3) | 61 (96.8) |
Prior carfilzomib therapy, n (%) | 77 (79.4) | 93 (75.3) | 56 (88.9) |
Prior BCMA-directed therapy | |||
ADC therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 46 (73) |
CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 20 (31.7) |
ADC and CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (4.8)|| |
Anti-BCMA bispecific therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.6)¶ |
Efficacy Population: BCMA-naïve (n=97) |
|
---|---|
Time since initial diagnosis (months), median | 79.6 |
Prior lines of therapy, median (range) | 5.0 (4-22) |
Prior stem-cell transplantation, n (%) | 70 (72.2) |
Triple-class | |
Exposed,* n (%) | 97 (100.0) |
Refractory,† n (%) | 94 (96.9) |
Penta-drug, | |
Exposed,‡ n (%) | 75 (77.3) |
Refractory,§ n (%) | 45 (46.4) |
Prior pomalidomide therapy, n (%) | 82 (84.5) |
Prior carfilzomib therapy, n (%) | 77 (79.4) |
Prior BCMA-directed therapy | |
ADC therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
ADC and CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
Anti-BCMA bispecific therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
Enrolled Population: BCMA-naïve (N=123) | |
Time since initial diagnosis (months), median | 72.9 |
Prior lines of therapy, median (range) | 5.0 (2-22) |
Prior stem-cell transplantation, n (%) | 87 (70.7) |
Triple-class | |
Exposed,* n (%) | 123 (100.0) |
Refractory,† n (%) | 119 (96.7) |
Penta-drug | |
Exposed,‡ n (%) | 87 (70.7) |
Refractory,§ n (%) | 52 (42.3) |
Prior pomalidomide therapy, n (%) | 100 (81.3) |
Prior carfilzomib therapy, n (%) | 93 (75.6) |
Prior BCMA-directed therapy | |
ADC therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
ADC and CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
Anti-BCMA bispecific therapy, n (%) | 0 (0) |
Cohort B: BCMA-exposed (n=63) | |
Time since initial diagnosis (months), median | 103.0 |
Prior lines of therapy, median (range) | 8 (4-19) |
Prior stem-cell transplantation, n (%) | 52 (82.5) |
Triple-class | |
Exposed,* n (%) | 63 (100.0) |
Refractory,† n (%) | 61 (96.8) |
Penta-drug | |
Exposed,‡ n (%) | 54 (85.7) |
Refractory,§ n (%) | 33 (52.4) |
Prior pomalidomide therapy, n (%) | 61 (96.8) |
Prior carfilzomib therapy, n (%) | 56 (88.9) |
Prior BCMA-directed therapy | |
ADC therapy, n (%) | 46 (73) |
CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 20 (31.7) |
ADC and CAR T-cell therapy, n (%) | 3 (4.8)|| |
Anti-BCMA bispecific therapy, n (%) | 1 (1.6)¶ |
To report an adverse event, please call 1-800-438-1985
Pfizer for Professionals 1-800-505-4426
This site is intended only for U.S. healthcare professionals. The products discussed in this site may have different product labeling in different countries. The information provided is for educational purposes only.
© 2024 Pfizer Inc. All rights reserved.